Legal Opinion
Bennett v. Permanente
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 20, 2013No. Civil Action No. 10-CV-2505 AWPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court has reviewed the record and deems a hearing unnecessary. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This case sounds in employment discrimination. Plaintiff Steven Bennett is a natural person who resides in the state of Maryland. Defendant Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Mid-Atlantic States, Inc. (Kaiser Permanente) is a managed care consortium that is headquarted in California…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Crockett v. SRA InternationalDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Chamberlain v. Securian Financial Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Thiessen v. Stewart-Haas Racing, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2018
- Adkins v. Peninsula Regional Medical CenterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Burnett v. Aldi, Inc. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.