Dixon v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant sustained bodily injury when she allegedly tripped over a hole in a public street. She brought this suit for damages, charging the District with negligent maintenance of the roadway. Government motions for directed verdict made at the end of the plaintiff’s case and later at the close of all the evidence were denied. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. The trial court, however, without stating its reasons therefor, set aside the verdict, entering judgment non obstante veredicto in favor of defendant-appellee. This is an appeal from that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Shewmaker v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Venstone Stone v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Hurd v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pitts v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Enders v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Shehyn v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Wharton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Hardy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.