Legal Opinion
Hardy v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 10, 1992No. 91-CV-960PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
Appellant Catherine Hardy appeals from the grant of summary judgment to appellee District of Columbia and dismissal of her case on the ground that the trial judge erred in ruling that her letter of notice to the Mayor under D.C.Code § 12-309 (1989 Repl.) failed to provide sufficient information regarding the location of the accident. We reverse.
I
Appellant Catherine Hardy, through counsel, sent the Mayor of the District of Columbia a letter pursuant to D.C.Code § 12-309 1 that stated in pertinent part:
At approximately 9:30 p.m. on Saturday, August 29,1987, Ms. Hardy was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pitts v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Romer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Washington v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Shehyn v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Venstone Stone v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- District of Columbia v. Arnold & PorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- District of Columbia v. DunmoreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Tucci v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Wharton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Brown v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.