Legal Opinion
Shehyn v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 16, 1978No. 12548PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in dismissing his complaint for failure to have given timely notice to the District of Columbia (D.C.Code 1973, § 12-309), and for failure to commence this action within the statutory period of limitation (id. § 12-301). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand for further proceedings.
I
Appellant sued the District of Columbia and a number of District employees (hereinafter referred to, collectively, as the defendants). The complaint, filed on March 31, 1976, alleged that the District was the lessee of a building owned…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Rieser v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Dellums v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Miller v. SpencerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Shea v. FridleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Hill v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Colbert v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Bussineau v. President of Georgetown CollegeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Choharis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- DiCampli-Mintz v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Romer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.