Smith & Gottlieb, Inc. v. Cheatham
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.
On June 28, Í939 appellee purchased from appellant certain premises in Takoma Park, Maryland. A written contract of sale of that date provided in part: “that assessments for improvements completed prior to the date hereof, whether assessment thereon has been levied or not, shall be paid by the seller or allowance made therefore at the time of transfer.”
It is conceded that prior thereto improvements consisting of water main and sewer, *677had been completed by the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission. Under Maryland law the cost of this improvement is imposed upon the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- United States v. MoserSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- O'Neill v. Supreme CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
- Olmstead v. BachCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Federal Life Ins. Co. v. RascoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kincade v. WahDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
- Hankin v. SpilkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Yuen v. DurhamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Lee v. DunbarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944