Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lee v. Dunbar

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1944No. 164Published

1DissentCayton, Associate Judge

There were two contests between these parties involving the same subject matter. They were heard by different judges. The first was on defendant’s motion in an earlier case to declare the truck exempt; the second before the trial judge in this case on defendant’s suit for wrongful attachment.

The first decision, rendered after a hearing on the merits, held the truck to be exempt. It decided the issue, became a finality and was appealable. Barrett v. Commercial Credit Co., 54 App.D.C. 249, 296 F. 996. But no appeal was taken.

In this case the trial judge decided ad« versely to plaintiff on two…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Clark v. Associated Retail Credit Men of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. Clegg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  4. Geracy, Inc. v. HooverCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  5. Reinkey v. Findley Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API