Kincade v. Wah
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Plaintiff sued in the Landlord and Tenant Branch of the trial court for possession of certain premises, alleging she was entitled to possession and that defendant held possession without right by forcible entry and detainer. The record is incomplete and unsatisfactory but we gather from it, and briefs of counsel here, that the following proceedings occurred at the trial. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence defendant’s counsel stated that the matter had been determined in a previous proceeding in another branch of the court and offered in evidence the docket entries of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Packet Co. v. SicklesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Larsen v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Scholl v. TibbsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
- Smith & Gottlieb, Inc. v. CheathamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thurston v. AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
- Crain v. CrainDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
- General Heating Engineering Company, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Daime v. PriceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Pappas v. CourembisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.