Bown v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Geraghty, J.—
Two actions were instituted by Robert F. Bown, Sr., against the city of Tacoma, Paul Lodge and wife, Frank Hiteshue and wife, and Verne L. Kent and wife; one as guardian of his minor son, Robert F. Bown, Jr., ten years of age, on account of personal injuries sustained by the minor, and the other in his own right, for medical expenses incurred on account of these injuries. The two cases were consolidated for purpose of trial and appeal. The defendants Kent and wife and Hiteshue and wife having been dismissed from the actions in the course of the trial, the jury returned verdicts…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Irwin v. HolbrookWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Wallin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. EckertWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Irwin v. Buffalo Pitts Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Allard v. Northwestern Contract Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rodgers v. RodgersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Glatt v. FeistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Peterson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Wintermute v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Breimon v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.