Legal Opinion

Bown v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1933No. Nos. 24681, 24682. Department TwoPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Geraghty, J.—

Two actions were instituted by Robert F. Bown, Sr., against the city of Tacoma, Paul Lodge and wife, Frank Hiteshue and wife, and Verne L. Kent and wife; one as guardian of his minor son, Robert F. Bown, Jr., ten years of age, on account of personal injuries sustained by the minor, and the other in his own right, for medical expenses incurred on account of these injuries. The two cases were consolidated for purpose of trial and appeal. The defendants Kent and wife and Hiteshue and wife having been dismissed from the actions in the course of the trial, the jury returned verdicts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Irwin v. HolbrookWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Wallin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State v. EckertWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Irwin v. Buffalo Pitts Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Allard v. Northwestern Contract Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. RodgersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Glatt v. FeistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Peterson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Wintermute v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Breimon v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API