Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1945No. 29447PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Respondent sustained an injury January 8, 1940, while employed in extrahazardous work. His claim was recognized by the department, and he was given medical care and time loss payments. November 9, 1942, subsequent to investigation, the supervisor of industrial insurance placed respondent upon the pension rolls for the reason that he was permanently totally disabled.

■ December 19, 1942, respondent appealed to the joint board with the request that he be adjudged permanently partially disabled. He based his appeal upon the following grounds:

“That the claimant was injured in the course of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State v. SevernsWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Abraham v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Harrington v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Omeitt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Davis v. North Coast Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Company v. TriWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Groff v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Clauson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. McIndoe v. Department of LaborWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. McIndoe v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API