Legal Opinion

State v. Eckert

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1933No. 24264. Department OnePublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

In the superior court, to which she appealed from a judgment of conviction in justice court upon a charge of manufacturing “intoxicating liquor, to-wit: Moonshine whiskey, with intent then and there to unlawfully sell and dispose of same,” the jury found the defendant guilty as charged. From the judgment and sentence pronounced against her on the verdict, the defendant appeals.

It is first urged that the complaint was duplicitous, and was also defective in failing to allege that the liquor the appellant was charged with manufacturing was capable of being used as a beverage.

The contention is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wallin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State v. MisetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. State v. MatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SevernsWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State v. HardamonWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Peterson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Wintermute v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API