Legal Opinion

Demarest v. Hardham

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On final hearing on bill and answer, and proofs taken in open-court.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Fleet, V. C.

This suit is brought to restrain a nuisance. The complainants and defendant occupy adjacent buildings on the north side of Market street, in the city of Newark. The complainants manufacture harness in theirs, and the defendant carries on the printing and book-binding business in his. The complainants arecopartners. Each building stands as close up to the line dividing the lots on which they are built as the walls could well be built, and consequently the west wall of the complainants’ building, in some places, comes in contact with the east wall of the defendant’s building.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Motley v. DarlingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
  2. Hazeltine v. CaseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hrycenko v. Bd. of Adjustment, ElizabethNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Kosich v. Poultrymen's Service Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  3. Gilpin v. Jacob Ellis Realties, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  4. Oechsle v. RuhlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  5. Wallace Tiernan Co. v. U.S. Cutlery Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API