Legal Opinion

Hrycenko v. Bd. of Adjustment, Elizabeth

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 22, 1953PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

27 N.J. Super. 376 (1953)

99 A.2d 430

JOSEPH HRYCENKO AND ANDREW WOJTOWICZ, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH, WALTER F. FROMM, SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDINGS, AND ALBERT J. WERNOCH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 14, 1953.

Decided September 22, 1953.

Before Judges CLAPP, GOLDMANN and EWART.

Mr. Richard F. Green argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants.

Mr. Albert L. Kessler argued the cause for defendant-respondent Albert J. Wernoch (Mr. Charles E. Leonard, attorney).

Mr. Raymond A. Leahy argued the cause…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Benton v. KernanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
  2. Hyde v. Somerset Air ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  3. Demarest v. HardhamNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1881
  4. Hey v. Seifert & Baime, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Borough of Upper Saddle River v. Rockland County Sewer District 1District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Maplewood v. TannenhausNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. North Plainfield v. PeroneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  5. State v. HollandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API