Legal Opinion

Oechsle v. Ruhl

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 12, 1947No. Docket 158/98PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a motion to strike the bill of complaint filed in the above entitled matter.

The bill of complaint, in brief, alleges that the defendant has obtained a license from the State Aviation Commission to construct and operate an airport or airfield and is now engaged in erecting runways and hangars and generally reconstructing the premises for which said license was received for airport or airfield purposes. Complainants further allege that they live in the neighborhood or vicinity of the proposed airport and that "the normal operation of an airfield or airport on defendant's premises will…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Thrasher v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Gilbough v. West Side Amusement Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902
  3. Morris & Essex Railroad v. PruddenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1869
  4. Benton v. KernanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  5. Kroecker v. Camden Coke Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HollandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Hyde v. Somerset Air ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  3. SCHANTZ v. RachlinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  4. Priory v. Borough of ManasquanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. Scotch Plains Tp. v. Town of WestfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API