Motley v. Darling
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Yice-Chancellor Lewis.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The bill was dismissed for want of equity and because complainant had an adequate remedy at law. There is no opinion of the vice-chancellor printed' in the case, and we are therefore not apprised of the reasons for his action except- so far as set out'in the order itself. - /
We consider that the dismissal of the bill was erroneous. It was predicated on the statements of-the bill itself; for, although there was an answer and replication, the latter was struck out *186and the answer withdrawn-; so the case stands as though there had been a demurrer or a motion to strike out the bill, and all the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Gilbough v. West Side Amusement Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902
- Burr v. BloomsburgNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Mayer v. Journeymen Stonecutters' Ass'nNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1890
- Demarest v. HardhamNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1881
- Grey ex rel. Simmons v. Mayor of PatersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.