Legal Opinion

Navajo Nation v. Peabody Coal Co.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 29, 2001No. 00-5072PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

Peabody Holding Company, Peabody Holding Company, Inc., and Peabody Western Coal Company (collectively, “Peabody”) appeal the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims that denied Peabody’s motion to hold the Navajo Nation (sometimes referred to as the “Nation”) and Paul E. Frye, the Navajo Nation’s counsel, in civil contempt for using, in a complaint filed ex parte and under seal against Peabody in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, a document Peabody produced in the Court of Federal Claims. Navajo Nation v. United States,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glaxo, Inc., and Glaxo Group Limited v. Novopharm, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. In Re Dual-Deck Video Cassette Recorder Antitrust Litigation. Go-Video, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Preemption Devices, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Navajo Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Navajo Nation v. Peabody Holding Co., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  2. ViroMed Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Pyramid Real Estate Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Mission Critical Solutions v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Anham Fzco v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API