ViroMed Laboratories, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
BLOCK, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Currently before this court are plaintiffs motion to impose contempt sanctions on the government and its application for a Rule 65 preliminary injunction in a bid protest action.2 Indeed, this is the second time these parties have graced this court’s doorstep in a dispute over Navy contract awards for HIV testing services. Plaintiff’s first bid protest3 was dismissed without prejudice after the court issued an order reflecting the parties’ apparently successful settlement discussions. ViroMed I Dismissal Order. The Navy then awarded a bridge…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Nvt Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- MORI Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Bayfirst Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- HP Enterprise Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Furniture By Thurston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Chenega Management, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.