Legal Opinion
Navajo Nation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 31, 2000No. 93-763LPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASKIR, Judge.
This matter involves the enforcement of a protective order issued by this Court. The moving parties, Peabody Holding Company, Inc., Peabody Coal Company, and Peabody Western Coal company (collectively “Peabody”) request that we hold in contempt plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel, Mr. Paul E. Frye, Esq., and impose sanctions. Peabody alleges that plaintiff violated the Court’s Confidentiality and Protective Order dated February 26, 1996, (CAPO) by using informa*354tion and documents subject to that Order, and specifically the “Sullivan memorandum,” to pursue a lawsuit against…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Dual-Deck Video Cassette Recorder Antitrust Litigation. Go-Video, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Ksm Fastening Systems, Inc. v. H.A. Jones Company, Inc. And Erico Jones CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Preemption Devices, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Navajo Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- On Command Video Corp. v. LodgeNet Entertainment Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Savantage Financial Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Navajo Nation v. Peabody Holding Co., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Pyramid Real Estate Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Navajo Nation v. Peabody Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Filtration Development Co., LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.