Legal Opinion
Mission Critical Solutions v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 12, 2012No. 09-864 CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Chief Judge.
On February 26, 2010 the court decided this bid protest case brought by plaintiff Mission Critical Solutions (plaintiff or MCS), holding that “[t]he Army’s award of the [information technology (IT) ] support services contract on a sole-source basis without first determining whether it should set aside the contract for restricted competition among qualified HUBZone small business concerns was not in accordance with law.” Mission Critical Solutions v. United States (Mission Critical I), 91 Fed.Cl. 386, 412 (2010). The court determined that plaintiff had met…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Contract Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Rlb Contracting, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Cully Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Gemini Tech Services LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026