Prince & Paul v. Don Mitchell's WLAQ, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff in fi. fa. appeals from the grant of a protective order to the individual defendant in fi. fa. who had refused to answer post-judgment interrogatories on the ground that they might tend to incriminate him. (This order was also a tacit overruling of plaintiff’s motion to compel answers).
1. The motion to dismiss is denied. As designated in the original action, the name of the party plaintiff imports a partnership. By failing to raise the issue of legal existence or capacity by specific negative averment any time before judgment, the defendant waived his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Haynes v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Mallin v. MallinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Smith v. Commissioners of Roads & RevenueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
3Cited by13 opinions
- Patterson v. Duron Paints of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Tennesco, Inc. v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Busby v. Citizens Bank of HapevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Chambers v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Brannon v. WhisenantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.