Legal Opinion

Tennesco, Inc. v. Berger

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 17, 1977No. 54925PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

1. Under Code § 81A-169 a judgment creditor may, in aid of the judgment, propound interrogatories of the judgment debtor "in the manner provided by this Title.” Code § 81A-133 (a) sets' out the manner of preparing and serving interrogatories on any adverse party and provides: "Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath, unless it is objected to, in which event the reasons for objection shall be in lieu of an answer.” As to objections to questions 2 through 105 each defendant made a blanket statement that the information requested "may…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Arndstein v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Plunkett v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Mayer Morganroth, Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor v. Frank FitzsimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  2. Eastham v. ArndtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. Jett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Dempsey v. Kaminski Jewelry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Cohran v. CarlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API