Legal Opinion
Stanley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 28, 1951No. A-11299PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
The plaintiffs in error, Wilson Stanley and Dan Martin, who will hereinafter be referred to' as defendants, were charged by information-filed in the district court of Okmulgee county for the crime of larceny of domestic animals; were tried before a jury, convicted, and were each sentenced to serve a term of eight years in the State Penitentiary. Appeal has been duly perfected to this court.
The evidence on behalf of the state developed that one Frank Nash, a colored farmer living in Creek county, eight miles west of Beggs, along about April 1, 1948, had a light cream colored Jersey cow, three…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Schmitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
- Stacey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- State v. SedilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Richmond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
- Tilford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1968
- Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.