Legal Opinion
In Re FirstEnergy Corp. Securities Litigation
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 3, 2004No. 5:03-CV-1684PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
GWIN, District Judge.
On February 23, 2004, Defendants moved to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Complaint. [Doc 60]. Defendants assert that Plaintiffs have failed to sufficiently plead securities fraud under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (“PSLRA”) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b). Plaintiffs oppose this motion. Further, Plaintiffs ask the Court to strike a number of Defendants’ exhibits attached to the motion to dismiss. [Doc. 72], For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiffs’ motion to strike and DENIES…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Richard G. Lawler v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt. Dunn, Captain McAlister Lieutenant Dunn, Officer Boehm, Officer Paul AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- In Re Exxon Mobil Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- In Re Alstom SA Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- In Re Cardinal Health Inc. Securities LitigationsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
- Podany v. Robertson Stephens, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- In Re Metropolitan Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2007
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.