Legal Opinion
Seagrape Investors LLC v. Tuzman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 6, 2023No. 1:19-cv-09736Unknown
1Opinion
DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #:. : □□ ———-—----------- DATE FILED: 1962023. SEAGRAPE INVESTORS, LLC, Plaintiff, 19-CV-09736 (RA)(SN) -against- ORDER TUZMAN, et al., Defendants. □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ +--+ ---------- -----------X SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff filed a letter motion alleging that Defendants improperly refused to produce supplemental discovery under Rule 26(e)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which Defendants opposed. See ECF Nos. 194, 195. Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery is DENIED. I.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- James W. Sanderson v. The Honorable Fred M. Winner, United States District Judge for the District OfcoloradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Star Direct Telecom, Inc. v. Global Crossing Bandwidth, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2011
- Parallel Iron LLC v. NetApp, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2015
- Braunstein v. PickensDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2011