Legal Opinion
Braunstein v. Pickens
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided May 17, 2011No. C.A. No. 2:08-cv-193-PMDPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Objections to the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of a United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs filed motions to update judgment and for supplemental proceedings, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 69 and 70, requesting financial discovery be produced by the Defendant and that certain stock certificates, at issue in this case, be delivered to them in partial satisfaction of the judgment against the Defendant. On April 13, 2011, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiffs’ motion be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Forest Sales Corporation v. Walter Bedingfield, Rufus McLartyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Analytical Engineering, Incorporated v. Baldwin Filters, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Bingham v. ZoltDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- James L. Gagan v. James A. MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Seagrape Investors LLC v. TuzmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Vir2us, Inc. v. Sophos Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021