Parallel Iron LLC v. NetApp, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
ANDREWS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE:
Currently before the Court is Defendant NetApp, Inc.’s request for attorney’s fees. *355(D.I.94). This matter has been fully briefed. (D.I.94, 103, 104), For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant’s request is GRANTED IN PART. Defendant’s requests for discovery and an injunction are DENIED.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff brought this suit against Defendant on June 18, 2012. (D.I.l). Plaintiff alleged that Defendant infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 7,197,662, 7,958,388, and 7,543,-177. (Id.) The complaint identifies the accused products as “by way of example and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- David Adams v. Freedom Forge CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Arunachalam v. IBMCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Adams v. GiissellDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. v. Alliant Insurance Services, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Arunachalam v. International Business Machines CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2019
- Better Path Coalition Planning Group v. City of HarrisburgDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.