Legal Opinion

Weenolsen v. Kamber

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 5, 1979No. 177-79PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs, owners of a one-half interest in commercial property on Church Street in Burlington, brought an action for partition under 12 V.S.A. § 5161 et seq. against defendant, owner of the other half. The parties stipulated the need for partition and the appointment of commissioners, which was duly ordered. Each party indicated a desire to purchase upon the terms approved as equitable by the commis*541sioners, but the trial court directed a sale under 12 V.S.A. § 5175, with each party authorized to bid. By agreement, interlocutory appeal was authorized, and the following question certified…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. South Burlington School District v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  2. Billings v. BillingsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946
  3. In Re DixonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilk v. WilkSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  2. Reitmeier v. KalinoskiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API