Legal Opinion
Reitmeier v. Kalinoski
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 2, 1986No. Civ. A. 85-2205PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARRY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Glenn A. Reitmeier, and Defendant, Kathryn J. Kalinoski, were engaged to be married when, on August 10, 1984, they purchased a lot of real property with a dwelling place upon it in Ewing Township, New Jersey. On that date they also executed an agreement contingent upon their marriage attempting to set forth their respective interests in that and other property. Plaintiff and defendant subsequently broke off their engagement and this court is now called upon to determine the appropriate disposition of the Ewing Township property.
It is undisputed that…
2Cases cited144 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pension Fund-Mid Jersey Trucking Industry-Local 701 v. Omni Funding GroupDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Coast Cities Truck Sales, Inc. v. Navistar International Transportation Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Bixler v. Oro Management, L.L.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Kohn v. Hursa (In Re Hursa)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Massey v. HrostekSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.