Legal Opinion
In Re Dixon
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided July 16, 1962No. 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHulburd, C. J.
This case is concerned with the question of whether the Village of Randolph may, under the laws of Vermont, furnish water to customers outside its territorial limits without coming under the jurisdiction of the public service board. The question arose in the following manner:
On March 10, 1961, Adam C. Dixon, along with eight others, addressed a letter to Charles Ross, chairman of the Public Service Commission and Thomas M. Debevoise II, attorney general, which read as follows:
"Dear Sirs:
We, the undersigned, are users of water supplied by the Village of Randolph, Vermont. We live outside the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Trybulski v. Bellows Falls Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Hall v. Village of SwantonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
- Valcour v. Village of MorrisvilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- Valcour v. Village of MorrisvilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Holyoke Water Power Co. v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Petition of Town of Springfield to CondemnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- Weenolsen v. KamberSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- American Museum of Fly Fishing, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.