Legal Opinion

Wilk v. Wilk

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 22, 2002No. 00-316PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Defendant Joseph P. Wilk appeals the decision of the superior court in this action for partition ordering him to transfer his one-eighth interest in a parcel of property located in the Town of West Rutland to plaintiff John F. Wilk in exchange for one-eighth of the fair market value of the parcel as determined by a panel of court-appointed commissioners. Defendant argues that the court erred by failing to order a public sale of the property and a subsequent dispersal of the proceeds to himself and plaintiff. He contends that the facts of this case are controlled by our holding in Billings v.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cabot v. CabotSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. In Re HandySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. Carter v. GugliuzziSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  4. Russell v. ArmitageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. State v. BeginsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. Parkway CleanersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  2. Begin v. BenoitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  3. Weale v. LundSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  4. Karen Wynkoop v. Gerard StratthausSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  5. Massey v. HrostekSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API