Vaccariello v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
On June 8, 1993, Mary Vaccariello, n.k.a. Mary Resha, had back surgery, which included the implantation of a medical device known as a “pedicle screw” into her spine.1 Pain similar to that which had precipitated the surgery recurred. On October 29, 1993, Vaccariello became aware that the pedicle screw itself might be the source of her then current pain. On November 10, 1993, Vaccariello was examined by a different doctor, who stated his belief that the pedicle screw was the source of her back pain.
*381On December 15, 1995, Vaccariello filed suit against appellee Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc., and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Seley v. G. D. Searle & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- Warner v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Doe v. Archdiocese of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Wyser-Pratte Management Co., Inc. v. Telxon Corporation, Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Tigg v. Pirelli Tire Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.