Legal Opinion

Peterson v. O.R. Anderberg Construction

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 25, 1998No. C7-97-2174PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANCASTER, Justice.

This workers’ compensation matter comes before this court by certiorari on the relation of O.R. Anderberg Construction Company and its workers’ compensation liability insurer, CIGNA Insurance Company, to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) affirming an equitable allocation of liability. Concluding that Minn. Stat. § 176.191, subds. la and 5 did not deprive the compensation judge of jurisdiction over the equitable allocation dispute, we affirm.

On July 17, 1980, Henry Peterson sustained a compensable low back injury while employed as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Zenith Dredge Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Marsolek v. Miller Waste MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Peniston v. City of MarshallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. New Creative Enterprises, Inc. v. Dick Hume & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Silva v. Maplewood Care CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Seehus v. Bor-Son Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Seehus v. Bor-Son Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API