Legal Opinion
Peniston v. City of Marshall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 22, 1934No. Nos. 29,875, 29,883PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JULIUS J. OLSON, Justice.
Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission awarding respondent compensation.
W. B. Peniston, employe-respondent, is a long-time resident of the city of Marshall, this state, and for many years served as a member of its police department. On January 28, 1930, while so employed, he suffered an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. At that time and until December 5, 1932, relator Maryland Casualty Company was the insurer of the city’s liability as employer. 1 Thereafter the Standard Accident Insurance Company became such.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Smith v. Mason Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Martin v. Northern Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Luks v. Western Crucible Steel Casting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
3Cited by15 opinions
- Marsolek v. Miller Waste MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Mund v. Farmers' Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Haverland v. Twin City Milk Producers Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Koski v. Erie Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Quinn v. Automatic Sprinkler Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.