Legal Opinion
Seehus v. Bor-Son Construction, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 10, 2010No. A09-1388Published
1Opinion of the Court
783 N.W.2d 144 (2010)
David K. SEEHUS, Respondent,
v.
BOR-SON CONSTRUCTION, INC. and CNA-RSKO, Respondents,
Wesley Residence, Inc. and MIGA by GAB Robins North America, Relators,
and Twin Cities Spine Center, Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Minnesota & Blue Plus, SMDC Health System, Minnesota DOLI/Vocational Rehab. Unit, Dr. Christine A. Audette, and Chiropractic Health Center, Intervenors.
No. A09-1388.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
June 10, 2010.
Russell J. LaCourse, LaCourse Law Office, P.A., Duluth, Minnesota, for respondent David K. Seehus.
Larry J. Peterson, Brent Kleffman, Peterson, Logren & Kilbury,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- In Re the Civil Commitment of GiemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Robinette v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Marriage of Rubey v. VannettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.