Legal Opinion
United States v. Rosas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 27, 2010No. 09-10011, 09-10013PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion filed July 27, 2010, is amended as follows:
1. On slip Opinion page 10811, line 4-5, please replace <we now must determine whether the district court abused its discretion when it found that Rosas was not a minor participant in the crime. > with <we now must determine whether the district court’s finding that Rosas was not a minor participant was clearly erroneous. >
2. On slip Opinion page 10812, line 7-8, please replace <The district court’s ruling was not clearly erroneous. > with <The district court’s finding was not clearly erroneous >.
OPINION
N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
A…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. Anthony GadsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Ramos-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. David TammanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Robert RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.