Legal Opinion
United States v. John Doe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 17, 2015No. 13-10385PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
The opinion filed February 17, 2015 is hereby withdrawn. An opinion will be filed in its place.
OPINION
Defendant John Doe 1 challenges several rulings of the district court, made following our remand of his previous appeal. We hold that the district court did not clearly err in determining that Doe was an “organizer” for purposes, of § 3Bl.l(e) of the Sentencing Guidelines, where his role was “coordinating the activities of the other participants to the extent necessary to complete the transaction.” See United States v. Varela, 993 F.2d 686, 692 (9th Cir.1993). We…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Corley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Rodney Robert Kimbrew, A.K.A. Carlton CochranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. JobCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Robert RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. James HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. HoldenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Duane EhmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.