Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramos-Medina

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 21, 2012No. 09-50408PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This court’s opinion, filed June 21, 2012, is amended by inserting the words “first-degree” before “burglary” in the following places: on page 7304 of the slip opinion, in the second sentence of the first paragraph; on page 7305, in the third sentence of the second full paragraph; on page 7306, in the first sentence under the heading “A. Ramos’s Prior Deportation;” on page 7307, in the first sentence of the first full paragraph and in the first and second sentences of the last (partial) paragraph; on page 7308, in the first full sentence on the *934page and the last sentence of the first…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. James Dimaya v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Venancio Rojas-PedrozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Christopher OsingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Hector Rodriguez-Castellon v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API