Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Weesner v. Electric Power Board of Chattanooga

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 6, 1961PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

This involves a controversy as to the amount of retirement compensation due certain employees of the Electric Power Board of Chattanooga, Tennessee, based on their rights under a retirement plan as promulgated by their employer.

In April, 1935, the Electric Power Board of Chattanooga was created by an act of the General Assembly of the State of Tennessee, and in response to the wide demand of employees throughout the United States for retirement benefits the officials of the said Electric Power Board put into effect a retirement plan for its employees and incorporated the same in a publication…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Forrish v. KennedySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Sigman v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Wilson v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Bird v. Connecticut Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  5. Textile Workers Union of America, Local No. 513 v. Brookside Mills, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Amos v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. McCarthy v. Louisville Cartage Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1990
  3. Miles v. Tennessee Consolidated Retirement SystemTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hayes v. Plantations Steel Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  5. Snow v. AbernathySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API