Legal Opinion
Sigman v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 8, 1937No. 5170PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By TATGENHORST, PJ.
Appeal en questions of law from the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.
Suit was instituted by the appellee to recover from the appellant the amount of a pension claimed to be due him by reason of his compliance with the terms of the pension requirements.
The appellant was engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of musical instruments. The appellee had been in the employ of the appellant for more than 27 years, when he was discharged because it had no further employment to which he was suited. He had served appellant as order clerk, salesman on the road,…
2Cited by25 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Horace Eugene Bayles v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Helle v. Landmark, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Estate of Bratton v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Bolling v. Clevepak Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.