Legal Opinion · Dissent

Application of Patrick

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 26, 1951No. Patent Appeal 5760Published

1DissentO’Connell, Judge

The two cases upon which the majority relies to the effect that the affidavit here in issue is not properly before the court were rendered obsolete by the action of the commissioner when he abolished the rule of those cases and all of the red tape which its enforcement entailed in the tribunals of the Patent Office.

This court has otherwise regarded an affidavit submitted on a petition for reconsideration as cumulative argument of the same character as that of the request for reconsideration and has accepted the argument thus advanced in the affidavit as a ground of reversal of the board on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Hunt v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  4. Lever Bros. Co. v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  5. In Re StoverCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API