Legal Opinion
Sean O'Kane A.I.A. Architect, P.C. v. Puljic
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 18, 2014No. AC35245PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
The plaintiff, Sean O’Kane A.I.A. Architect, P.C., 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendants, Goran Puljic and Melinda Pul-jic. The plaintiff claims that the court erred in (1) concluding that his breach of contract claim was barred by the statute of limitations; (2) finding that the parties did not enter into a “standstill” agreement, thus tolling the statute of limitations; and (3) concluding that the count of his complaint alleging unjust enrichment was barred by the doctrine of laches. We affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Fichera v. Mine Hill Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Dreier v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Schwarzschild v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Rosato v. MascardoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Actiq Sales & Marketing Practices LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Doe v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2015