Legal Opinion
Berken v. Beneficial Standard Life Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 21, 1974No. 44523PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendant, Beneficial Standard Life Insurance Company. We affirm.
The agreed statement of the case under Rule 110.04, Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, provides in pertinent part as follows:
“This is an action for recovery of an accidental death benefit allegedly payable under a policy of health and accident insurance issued by defendant to plaintiff’s father. After the pleadings were closed, both parties moved for- summary judgment on the basis of the pleadings and supporting affidavits. The relevant and undisputed facts…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dairyland Insurance v. Implement Dealers InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Bonney v. CITIZENS'MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Vaughn v. Standard Surety & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1944
- Bettenburg v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp., Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. RiceTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Leonard v. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc. (In Re SRC Holding Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Noran Neurological Clinic, P.A. v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Starrett v. Oklahoma Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- STATE DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY v. OggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- David L. Edgley v. Harold Joseph Lappe, Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation, Defendant/third Party v. Krause & Rollins, Objector v. National Liability & Fire Insurance Company, a Connecticut Corporation, Garnishee/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.