Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Rice

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1959PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepston

The sole determinative question is the proper interpretation of an exclusionary clause in a public liability automobile insurance policy.

The case was tried on a stipulation of facts and a judgment rendered below in favor of William K. Rice against State Farm Mutual Insurance Company. The parties will be hereinafter referred to as in the trial court as plaintiff and defendant respectively.

The two assignments of error are:(1) The trial court erred in the construction it gave to T.C.A. secs. 50-914 and 50-1004 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law; and(2) The trial court erred in the construction it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bonney v. CITIZENS'MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Kopp v. Home Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Pitts v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  4. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP. v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1955

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Griswold v. Union Labor Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Brown v. Indiana Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Cash v. American Health InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  4. Phillips v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  5. Berken v. Beneficial Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API