State v. Spradling

Donald Ray Spradling (“Defendant”) was found guilty after a jury trial of one count of possession of a controlled sub*672stance with intent to distribute and two counts of possession of a controlled substance. See sections 195.211 and 195.202.1 Defendant now appeals his convictions, contending the trial court erred in overruling his pre-trial motion to suppress and subsequent trial objection to evidence seized from his home pursuant to a search warrant. Defendant maintains “that the search was executed well beyond ten days after issuance of the search warrant rendering the warrant invalid…