Legal Opinion
State v. Miller
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 9, 1991No. 58571, 58572PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AHRENS, Judge.
Appellants Stephen and Birdine Miller were charged by information with misdemeanor possession of marihuana in violation of § 195.202 RSMo (Supp.1989). The evidence supporting the charges was obtained pursuant to a search of appellants’ home. At trial, appellants moved to quash the search warrant and suppress the evidence obtained through its execution. The trial court denied the motion after a hearing and convicted appellants after presentation of evidence, ordering each to pay a fine of $150.00 plus court costs. We affirm.
The search warrant in question was issued on November 8,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. DowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. AltmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- State v. DawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Conway v. VillaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. MitchellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.