Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Broyles

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 2, 1966No. 89PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParrott, J.

In this chancery action complainants are the owners of the majority of the lots in Murray Hills Estates, a residential subdivision containing- houses costing $25,000 to $40,000. Defendants are the original sub-dividers and defendant, J. C. Broyles, is a contractor who has started construction of duplexes on two lots. Complainants ’ original bill avers the erection of these duplex dwellings violates the restrictive covenants of the subdivision. From the decree of the Chancellor denying the injunction and dismissing their original bill, complainants have appealed.

On March 2, 1962, the Tennessee…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Turnley v. GarfinkelTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Laughlin v. WagnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Lowe v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Humphrey v. . BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Thompson v. Glenwood Community Club Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Parks v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  2. Shea v. SargentTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Arthur v. Lake Tansi Village, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Maples Homeowners Ass'n v. T & R Nashville Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  5. Benton v. BushCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API