Legal Opinion

Arthur v. Lake Tansi Village, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1979PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKS McLEMORE, Special Justice.

This case involves the question of whether there exist implied restrictive covenants running with the land which prohibit the defendant-respondent, hereinafter called the defendant, from removing or relocating certain recreational facilities, namely; (1) a marina which is to be relocated from the north shore of Lake Tansi, to the south shore, which would place a modern marina equipped to moor and service some 80 boats along a dam in close proximity to plaintiffs’ property; (2) a sand beach which has been destroyed, but which according to the defendant’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Grass v. Big Creek Development Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Land Developers, Inc. v. MaxwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Lowe v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. R. Douglas Hughes v. New Life Development CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Hicks v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  3. Perry v. Bridgetown Community Ass'n, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Williams v. FoxTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Greig Massey v. R.W. Graf, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API