Legal Opinion

Kelm v. Kelm

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1993No. 92-1523PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

While this case has, and continues to have, a long and convoluted history, the single question before this court is whether, in a domestic relations case, matters of temporary spousal and/or child support may, by agreement of marriage partners, be made subject to an agreement to arbitrate. For the reasons that follow, we answer this question in the affirmative.

Arbitration, as a method of alternative dispute resolution, has long been favored in the law. See Findlay City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Findlay Edn. Assn. (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 129, 551 N.E.2d 186; and Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Mental…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mahoning County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Mahoning County TMR Education Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Schaefer v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Board of Education v. Findlay Education Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Faherty v. FahertySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Gross v. GrossOhio Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. ABM Farms, Inc. v. WoodsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Kelm v. KelmOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. City of Piqua v. Fraternal Order of Police, Ohio Labor Council, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Gates v. GatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  5. ABM Farms, Inc. v. WoodsOhio Supreme Court · 1998

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API