ABM Farms, Inc. v. Woods
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 81 Ohio St.3d 498.] ABM FARMS, INC. v. WOODS ET AL., APPELLEES; MAUST ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as ABM Farms, Inc. v. Woods,
1998-Ohio-612.] Arbitration—Enforcing arbitration agreement—Requirement to defeat motion for stay brought pursuant to R.C. 2711.02. To defeat a motion for stay brought pursuant to R.C. 2711.02, a party must demonstrate that the arbitration provision itself in the contract at issue, and not merely the contract in general, was fraudulently induced. (No. 96-1803—Submitted October 22, 1997 at the Muskingum County…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- ABM Farms, Inc. v. WoodsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Haller v. Borror Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Michael A. Gerard, Inc. v. HaffkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Wallace v. Ganley Auto GroupOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Chrysler Fin. Servs. v. HendersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Jacob v. Buckeye Chrysler-Jeep-Dodge, 2007-Ca-0121 (7-14-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Hodell-Natco Industries, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.