Legal Opinion

Lowrie v. H. A. Meldrum Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York

Decided August 5, 1903No. 181PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Suit for infringement of letters patent No. 652,407, for a garment fastener, granted to Anna M. K. Steel June 26, 1900. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

The bill in this case charges infringement of patent No. 652,407, granted June 26, 1900, to Anna M. K. Steel, for a new and useful improvement in garment fasteners. The complainant is the owner of the patent, having acquired such ownership by an assignment which shows good title, and no substantial reason appears for rejecting the assignment because of faulty execution. The object and scope of the invention is to provide means for fastening women’s wearing apparel. The device is specially designed to be secured to the front of the clothing, and to the corset, so as to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Hailes v. Van WormerSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Morley Sewing MacHine Co. v. LancasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Hobbs v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Mitchell v. TilghmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Town of Checotah v. Town of EufaulaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Metz & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Colman v. Byrd Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API