State v. Gibson

¶ 1. Jeffrey Gibson appeals from his eighth conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant, contrary to WlS. Stat. § 346.63(l)(a). Gibson contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the blood test results because the blood was taken after he had initially refused the test. He reasons that the implied consent statute provides the exclusive remedy for an OWI suspect's refusal to submit to a chemical test. Additionally, he contends that after the evidence was completed, the trial court erred by granting the State's motion to amend…